When you see those banner ads on wikis for donations, that's who you're donating to. It's sort of complicated - there's an ideological nonprofit called the Wikimedia Foundation that hosts all the various WikiProjects and maintains the software that's used (mostly mediawiki and some associated services). It's a struggle though because the page is a poorly laid out mishmash of information, mostly written by people who don't understand the subject. But if you can't do that you can sort of get some of the information from Wikipedia. The best way to find out about these is to speak to someone who works in suicide prevention, so that would be people working for local authority suicide prevention partnership boards (they can have different names in different areas), or people working for NCISH or MASH or ONS, or people on Twitter. If you want to understand suicide in the UK you need to know, at a minimum, about ONS, NCISH, Fingertips, and then coroners for England and Wales and whatever the equivalent is for Scotland and Northern Ireland. Now, everyone makes an Old Fashioned a little bit differently-here’s Esquire’s official recipe-but Nyberg’s way was definitely wrong and totally hilarious. In the series’ most infamous video, the actress, model, and part-time bartender slops together an Old Fashioned using no bitters, a giant orange wedge, a ton of ice, and an entire pint glass of bourbon. had hired JaNee Nyberg to host a series of 50 cocktail tutorial videos that they would then upload to their YouTube channel. > The world’s worst Old Fashioned was made on a quiet summer morning in 2010, in a dot com startup’s shoddily decorated conference room in Santa Monica. ![]() Jim Beam Just Gave Her a Shot at Redemption. > JaNee Nyberg Once Made the World’s Worst Old Fashioned. IIRC, those videos are pretty famous because the pretty girl was not actually any good at mixing drinks: Not ending world hunger or anything, but nothing deceitful here at least. Then proceeds to show how to mix a drink. > Game how? Pretty girl says she will show how to mix a drink. Add to that a surprisingly under-the-radar company culture which has avoided any major blow ups despite its community wielding so much leverage over the world's education and having to make a lot of difficult calls on a daily basis. Wikipedia's dominance continues because it's basically impossible to overcome its lead in inbound links and domain authority. So when Panda came around, Google correctly rewarded Wikipedia with #1 rankings for over 50% of its terms (!!), and Jason Calacanis had to shut down Mahalo which got destroyed by Panda. Wikipedia killed it in SEO when it was easy to do so, but it also did one other thing that most SEO-driven sites (eg: About) didn't do correctly - it cared deeply about the content quality and also resisted to run ads (anyone remember Jason Calacanis' articles on how they are leaving $100m on the table? See ). Add to that the subdomain-driven localization strategy and many other moves that were considered SEO best practices back in those years when the on-page factors used to matter.īut that was just the start. Wikipedia's habit of deep interlinking helped it rank back in the early aughts when the SEO rules were rather simple. I am surprised that the comments haven't mentioned the role of SEO in Wikipedia's growth and defensibility.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |